\u0130zmir\u2019de annesinden kalan miras\u0131 almak i\u00e7in tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvuran ki\u015fi, n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda annesine ili\u015fkin bilgi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmesi sonras\u0131 ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuk m\u00fccadelesini kazand\u0131.<\/div>
Narl\u0131dere il\u00e7esinde ya\u015fayan 64 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Z.K, annesi F.\u00dc'y\u00fc 15 Ekim 2013'te kaybetmesinin ard\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k 9 y\u0131l sonra mirastan kalan mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmek i\u00e7in Narl\u0131dere Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Kad\u0131n\u0131n n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdan\u0131nda anne ismi yazmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen n\u00fcfus m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda annesine ili\u015fkin bilgilerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnmedi\u011fi belirlendi.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Mirastan kalan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2016'da 2 karde\u015fine payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yasal olarak tapu iptalinin yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenen Z.K, C\u0130MER'e ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Ba\u015fvuru sonras\u0131 \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 N\u00fcfus ve Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce ge\u00e7en y\u0131l kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltme i\u015flemi yap\u0131larak Z.K'nin anne ba\u011f\u0131 kuruldu.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Z.K, kay\u0131tlarda yap\u0131lan hata nedeniyle miras hissesinden mahrum kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fikayetiyle avukat\u0131 G\u00fcney \u00c7a\u011fatay \u00d6z arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Hazine aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Daval\u0131 vekili, \"di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\" \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n\u0130zmir 22. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen dosyada daval\u0131 vekili, \"di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildikleri halde hisseyi kendi adlar\u0131na tescil ettirmek suretiyle k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli davrand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ki\u015filerin kusurlu davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 nedeniyle illiyet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kesildi\u011fini\" \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek, devletin sorumlulu\u011fundan bahsedilemeyece\u011fini savundu.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Mahkeme, karar\u0131nda T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu 38. maddesindeki \"ki\u015fisel durum sicilinin tutulmas\u0131ndan do\u011fan zararlar, kusurlu memura r\u00fccu edilmek kayd\u0131yla devlet\u00e7e tazmin edilir.\" h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince mirastan kalan mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011feri olan 1 milyon 569 bin liran\u0131n yasal faiziyle davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\"Adil bir karar oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum\"<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\nAvukat \u00d6z, m\u00fcvekkilinin kay\u0131tlara \"annesiz\" ge\u00e7ti\u011fini bilmedi\u011fini, bunu \u00f6\u011frenince \u00e7ok \u015fa\u015f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Verilen m\u00fccadele sonucu haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderildi\u011fini belirten \u00d6z, \"M\u00fcvekkil a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ma\u011fduriyetinin giderilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 bizim i\u00e7in \u00e7ok anlaml\u0131 oldu. Adil bir karar oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum.\" dedi.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>